David has gone to the same camp for the past nine years. He worked his way up the ranks of awards and badges each summer, impressing counselors and cabin mates. He’s a genuinely good kid and was simply doing what his parents taught him. Last year he received the coveted Teepee pendant, a sure indication that as a camper he had a shot at the granddaddy of them all: the Tomahawk Award.
Only one senior is eligible and he had this final summer to do it.
Thing is, they asked him to enter the pre-counselor track this year. A summer of grunt work, really, and it meant he’d have to miss his chance for camper glory. The best he could do was wear last year’s pendant (which he was – and proudly so – when I met him in July).
As we sat atop Mt. Mitchell on the fourth day of our backpacking trip, under the observation deck ramp to hide from the blazing sun, I facilitated a group discussion on the temptation to be spectacular. It seemed like a good topic for our leadership training theme, but we had hiked hard that morning and had three peaks still to go. Student attentiveness was spotty.
Except for David’s. Turns out he was not only listening, but also discovering his Me Monster:
Oh yeah, well my peak is higher than yours.
Mt. Mitchell is 6684’ above sea level, making it the highest peak east of the Mississippi. The peak itself isn’t all that magnificent. It’s geographically and boringly round, and the views it permits can be seen by any number of sites in the area. Worse yet, the place is littered with tourist buildings, pavement and people. Folks come from near and far to get their picture next to the “Highest” sign (confession: we did, too) as if they were meeting Clint Eastwood or Taylor Swift.
We talked and wrote in our journals and then hiked on to Mt. Craig, a peak just north on the trail and only 37’ lower than Mt. Mitchell. At a rock outcropping, we turned back to see what we expected to be the glory of Mt. Mitchell. Instead we saw the parking lots and people and all the visual pollution and we collectively sighed,
It’s not all that.
In fact, our best memories came from a lesser known, blueberry-covered point called Pinnacle, which, at 118’ shy of Mitchell and maybe only one hundred feet wide, is a nobody peak in comparison. (Not much demand for bathrooms or snack bars on Pinnacle.)
What struck David was the realization that he spent last year at camp desiring everyone to notice his accomplishments. His innocent success as a child had become an idol. He wanted to be the most spectacular kid at camp and knew that this year could have been it. But Mt. Mitchell’s 37’ additional feet of “It’s not all that” put his once-held ambition in perspective.
Moving from popularity to ministry
The temptation to be spectacular – a phrase I borrowed from Henri Nouwen – is dangerous because it threatens both leadership and community. Nouwen writes in In the Name of Jesus: Reflections on Christian Leadership,
“The leadership about which Jesus speaks is of a radically different kind from the leadership offered by the world. It is a servant leadership…in which the leader is a vulnerable servant who needs the people as much as they need him or her.”
The temptation to be spectacular threatens leadership because striving for spectacular isolates the leader. Spectacular leaders fail to see their vulnerabilities, or at least fail to let others see them, thereby elevating themselves to a suprahuman level. This is why presidential campaigns are often so cruel. Candidates don’t disclose their weaknesses, so competitors and the rest of us do it for them.
And community is threatened because the spectacular leader’s self-glorifying pursuit often leaves behind a wake of jealousy, envy, and distance, all for his or her own gain. Spectacular, at least in the sense I’m using it here and in the way David wanted it, doesn’t aid community. It tramples it.
Nouwen encourages the spectacular person to move from popularity to ministry. I like this movement because it works in so many contexts: family, church, office, neighborhood, baseball team…. As ministers, we don’t need steroids to break home run records, or endless dreams of getting a star added to Hollywood Boulevard, or Tomahawks to make notches in camp popularity. We need ministry.
The temptation for some of us continues to be strong. The Me Monster looms large. I have hope for David, though. He is seeing a new view for the first time, and that is truly spectacular.
Have you met your Me Monster? (My thanks to Brian Regan for describing it so well.)
Was there a point in your life when the temptation to be spectacular was noticeably strong?
Where do you see the need for movement from popularity to ministry in your daily work?
Photo by Nightpike. Used with permission. Post written by Sam Van Eman.






{ 43 comments… read them below or add one }
I have often battled the Me Monster in a variety of forms – from pride to self-pity. Thanks for the reflection and words of encouragement.
So, I am stuck on the title. Because the more I fight something, the more monstrous it gets.
Spectacular? Sure, I’d like to be spectacular at some things. Is that always bad? Not sure. (Currently, I am working on being spectacular at ballet by the age of 55.
)
How you fight is key. If David were to fight his Me Monster with another Me Monster, then he’d miss the point. For him, fighting the temptation means recognizing – in that split-second moment – the urge to tell the nine wisdom tooth tale, and then denying himself the opportunity to actually tell it.
By the way, I call these split-second moments, Situational Sabbaths.
Regarding ballet, I hope you do become spectacular by 55 (and I will want tickets for two), but not if it’s a goal based on insecurity and trampling. I believe ballet requires a more light-footed approach anyway?
Lol, well I’d have to choose something besides ballet if I was going to assuage a need to overcome insecurity and trample others. I’m the lowest of the low in the class. I laugh at myself most days. Other days I pretend I’m a little queen, in the best sense of the word.
I like your show of discernment between two meanings of spectacular. And I still want those tickets.
Maybe Claire and I can do a show at Laity Lodge. She will show you what fifth position looks like and I will show you the anti-fifth. : )
Also, on the fighting thing… I find I can’t use it as a metaphor. It is psychically damaging to me, because it is like I am fighting myself, which ultimately is a form of attack instead of a leading out.
I know, maybe it’s just semantics. But in practice this means looking to ways to grow and open out rather than focusing on denial. If I were David, for instance, I would probably begin to look for ways to love others and myself more. Practical ways. (Like taking ballet. Though that might not work for David ; – )
I remember that we talked about this before. I like the positive approach and it’s ultimately what David (and all of us) need to do: “love others and myself more.”
The language of self-denial doesn’t have the same negative effect on me, though I go back and forth between the great commandments and Matthew 16:24 as most inspiring.
Wandering way off topic L.L., but most times do you find that “just semantics” is anything but? I do. The words we choose create the images, and whether it seems like hair-splitting or not, I think many times it makes all the difference in the world.
Lyla, you make me smile. I guess I was sort of apologizing ahead of time for (ha!
fighting over this point a little bit.
Yes, I suppose it isn’t just semantics. Fight implies vanquishing. Which doesn’t seem to work for the personality. We think we are vanquishing something inside by “fighting” it, but really we are just pushing it to a different corner. The personality always reasserts.
So I guess I have come to the place of trying to befriend and understand myself. Rather than fight a temptation to be spectacular, for instance, I might do a lot of soul searching about that achey little feeling of wanting to be a star. I might find positive ways to be a star and make others into stars too. I might discover that I am a person with a lot on my mind, who has the ability to get things done. And I might find areas to do that where the world would be made a better place because of it.
Rambling now. But thanks for digging a little deeper into that comment.
Lyla and LL, I like this semantics exchange. Who knows how many others may resonate differently depending on the language used.
I wonder if guys respond more to fight/battle language.
How you fight is key, yes, but I think too that why you fight is key. But Sam, you nail that with what you borrow from Nouwen: move from popularity to ministry. None of us really wants to be mediocre. “Adequate” seems limp. But spectacularity (is that a word?), if we ever manage that, would best serve others, not my ego.
I so appreciate this post. I’ll be sitting in it yet a while today.
I’m glad you mention the disdain for mediocre, Lyla. Spectacular, sans Me Monster, is quite an inspiring alternative.
“…The more I fight something, the more monstrous it gets.”
yes, this I understand. this is the part of my clay that makes me look at God and go, “Now, Potter, why did You make me this way? It’s all backwards!”
Thanks, Sam. This verbalizes so much of what I have experienced and journeyed through in the last two years. The temptation to be spectacular. That is a wonderful way of saying it. I am so grateful to Henri Nouwen for his wise words. And grateful to you for passing them on with your own insights.
Joel (and Tony), I’m glad you found this encouraging. I know the Me Monster well. Too many times have I walked away from interactions with others and wished I would have been more secure and more loving.
Pressing on.
I think it shows up in the subtlest of ways. I tend to call it a need for approval, but it really amounts to the same thing. Even in this business of blogging – what began as a desire to use writing as a ministry quickly became a sort of contest for comments and followers. I’ve struggled with this for some time. The striving for approval is just exhausting. Serving is truly much more fulfilling.
You nailed it, Linda: exhausting.
Great post (and not just because of the Brian Regan video – loved that!). For me, becoming a novelist has been an effective way to beat off the me-monster because no matter how you write some people will think it’s “spectacular” and others will think it’s the worst thing ever. I got two new Amazon reviews on my first novel this year (it’s now 10 years old – hadn’t received a new review since 2004), and one was about how it was the best book and she’s recommending it to all her friends, and the other was titled “Too Bad to Be Believed.” Ha! I sat back and knew that God was telling me to just be faithful — try to do the right thing, write the best I can, don’t try to impress anyone. So, that’s the new motto — be faithful, do right, don’t worry about it.
Gotta love Brian Regan, Marlo.
I’m glad you can take your reviews so well. I’ve received good and bad, and the bad simply fester in me.
Sam- I am classic overachiever, the “Me monster” is lurking behind every corner of my life. Just when I think I’ve shut off every avenue a new opportunity comes before me for the achiever to rise once again. It’s a delicate balance however, I do believe that God wants us to use our talents to the best of our abilities. This means that there is always something in our life that threatens to feed our pride or become and idol.
I am learning that in my vulnuabilities I am better able to make the real magic happen in whatever it is I’m trying to accomplish be it writing or parenting or friendship. Instead of being the excellent parent who never yells, I am the embarrassed parent who appoligizes for being too sharp. This doesn’t feed the spectacular image but it does indeed create something spectacular and Godly. I would prefer not to be vulnurable and simply strive for excellence. It’s not comforatable and I miss some of the labels that I’ve forgone. It’s clean and good though– and that’s priceless.
I see that need for balance, Nichole. It’s those areas in which I’m most likely to succeed that most get in the way of faithfulness. Psalm33:16-22 comes to mind here.
This post is has interesting timing for me. I’m in a place lately where I feel that God is teaching me graceful acceptance of praise – without deflection that trends into false humility. If I simply accept the praise, I gain courage to move forward and “let my light so shine.”
But when I try to be the best, to garner ALL the praise, the story changes, the focus changes, and it’s no longer about the gifts God has given me or the people I’m sharing them with/for. It’s about me, greedy and gobbling over glory that shouldn’t be mine.
In photography, I learn every day about sharing praise and work with others, lifting them up and encouraging them in their work, instead of competing brutal to be on top. When I compete to build Me up, Me pretty much fails. I have to start back at square one, back at “I don’t know.”
Great post.
If only judging by Maureen’s recent interview of you, Kelly, it’s easy to see the opportunities you’ve had to take praise gracefully. I’m glad for this, and more glad for your willingness to do it right.
Love, love, love this post. The video hits my monster right in the head. I’ve linked this to my blog for my friends to see…
Hmm. Fight the Me Monster. I think “fight” appeals to me, as in trying to love and do what’s right and beyond that, letting go. No fists or guns involved in the constant fight to let go. Ugh.
I have a low tolerance for chronic one-uppers. Have you spent much time with non-Christian 20-something guys? People can say what they want about the church, but I’ve found it extremely hard to come across a…”secular” young (ish) man that’s not a Me Monster.
Yeah, sure you can bench press 300 lbs…
Something I read just before coming to your post:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20634610
Excellent entry. Difficult reminder. Thanks Sam!
Nouwen’s advice is good — to move from popularity (“me-centered”) to ministry (“other-centered”). The popularity bit is hard though — it naturally appeals for all kinds of reasons. Good story and good lesson here, Sam.
it seems harmless to be given recognition for doing something well,
yet, it is a fine line from there, to doing things that we do well, just to
achieve the recognition.
recognition is addicting and can easily lead us by the nose.
even to a place that we don’t realize how much we depend
on what we do to attain this recognition. it becomes a part of
who we are.
and when we are no longer do this thing or are able to do it,
we then realize how much we desire and depend on being fed
this diet of recognition.
we all have little me monsters, and if we feed them too much
they get too big.
cool video, by the way.
nAncY, I saw a few minutes of The Office the other night. Michael was claiming to have no need for affirmation (the previous vignette clearly said otherwise) and gave reasons to support this claim. Then he went on to say he did have a need for praise. A humorous little bit.
He’s a shining example of insecurity screaming out for love and for the quelling of a Me Monster.
What a wise young man your David is to see the Big Picture and choose ministry.
I love the semantics discussion. Still wondering about the fight language. Today, in her sermon, my pastor said the ancient Hebrews believed that when a word was released from the mouth it created energy and held real power. I think there may be something to that. I’m still thinking about it and would like to read more on this belief.
And the video? It made me laugh out loud. My husband even had to watch it when he overheard what I was listening to.
Good one, Sam.
Your phrase, “in her sermon” – was that for semantics’ sake?
Anyway, good point here about words holding real power, Laura. Could this be why we care about semantics and why Lyla asked above, “[D]o you find that ‘just semantics’ is anything but?”
The Me Monster is alive and well in my life. This was a great and timely post. Thanks much.
Yes, it’s 12:37 am Monday morning. No, I didn’t take much of a Sabbath today – except for that half-hour nap and that gathering of friends at Hans Frozen Custard six hours or so ago. I’m neck deep in paint at our new/old house and working nearly around the clock there and in the office.
So it was good to see an email from Bob G (see comment above) when I got in just now. Bob lives a few miles away and offered to help me move in a couple of weeks. Cool guy. Thanks, Bob!
Back on topic, go read Bob G’s link that he included above. What a great fit. (We call them YAMs: Young Athletic Males)
That video clip cracked me up — loved his description of the wisdom teeth, and the roots wrapping around the tongue and out the nose. Graphically entertaining!
Anyway, I’m painfully familiar with the Me Monster, oh yeah. Have a new boss at work, and that’s brought out some of the worst me-ness I’ve seen in myself in a long time. I wrote about it here: http://www.thehighcalling.org/Library/ViewLibrary.asp?LibraryID=5704 [is it being Me Monsterish that I just linked to one of my own posts?]
Luckily I was reading Acts at the same time I was transitioning with the new boss at work — Barnabus and Paul’s relationship helped illuminate my Me Monster pretty clearly.
Great post, Sam — thank you.
You’re funny, Michelle. I just commented on your High Calling post (a good and relevant post, I might add) and included a link back to here.
Now we’re even.
Ok good, that makes me feel much less self-promotional!
And thanks for the comment and the link-back.
Does anyone else feel like a little me-monster whenever ya leave a comment? Or an even bigger one when you write a blog post?
Those convictions make me consider stopping blogging altogether.
But then I remember the freedom from sin’s grasp I found in BlogLand. And the really real friends. And the family of God.
By the way, a me-monster sat behind us during a baseball game the other night. I wanted to stand up, flap my arms & squawk like a duck just to give all the baseball fans a break from his me-diatribe. Would they have thought me a me-monster?
Funny video. Good lesson.
Blessings.
Once you see the Me Monster, you see it everywhere, eh?
I would’ve enjoyed watching you literally fight that Me Monster.
Powerful post…
To decrease and Him increase and all else be loss to the surpassing knowledge of knowing Christ.
Thank you for writing God’s truth.
Ann, I wonder if this posture is difficult to take because of fear that His increase will not be sufficient for my increase. It’s a dependence thing. If I decrease, then I’m left potentially with just decrease. There’s an element of faith required that God will be sufficient.
Your comment calls to mind something I wrote a few years ago on a place called the middle ground. Thanks for the reminder.
i am learning this so deeply…this year especially. We have seasons where God lifts us up and puts us in the front line of ministry and other times it’s the exact opposite and we are at best, in the shadows. Because of the stripping God has been doing in my own life, he so distinctly reminded me to do the things that no one sees. do the things that only God sees. Serve Him in the quiet hour and in the stillness of solitude…And when I have the desire to revert back to attracting attention for all the wrong motives, I am reminded once again…do all things unto Him, not unto me….
Melissa, I love this humble approach. It connects well with Ann Voskamp’s comment above and they are good, good words to keep in mind.
Gosh..I think I am challenged with this daily. Do we do the thing that really works and really brings in business or do we do the thing that draws attention to me. This American Life recently re-ran one of their best episodes which was on summer camp. Sounds like this story would have mixed in nicely…